Survey Report

Name:

Tutor:

Course:

Date:

Survey Report

Introduction

Survey is the field of connected insights of human exploration studies. It is the study approach that examines the testing of individual units from a population and the related overview information meeting procedures, for example, poll development and techniques for enhancing the number and precision of reactions to studies being undertaken. In the research the issue of responsiveness given by the survey process was determined using random samples as well as corporations from the fortune 500 list. The data assembled within a six year period was used to determine the nature of the survey importance in issues affecting benefits, restrictions, responses and respective outcomes from the same. The extended increases and decreases also showed a limitation in the consistency basis for the survey method of data collection.

Discussion

Table 1

Percentage  Increase	Number of Responses	Percentage of Total
0-29	26	17
30-59	49	32
60-99	17	11
100-149	29	19
150-200	10	7
200+	22	14
TOTAL	153	100

 

The table indicates the increase and decrease in number of surveys that have been received during the six year period. Likewise, the table also shows the respective response obtained by the companies as per the surveys administered within the same period and respective percentages.  From the table it is clear to observe that the gradual growth of the annual periods to the later years of six years shows that there is a general non- responsive nature of the people towards expressing their views and illustration of the views that characterize the organization’s placing.

Table 2

More Restrictive	Number of Responses	Percentage of Total
Very definitely	58	33
Moderately	38	23
Slightly	28	17
Not at all	46	27
TOTAL	168	100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 shows the degree of restrictiveness of the corporate policy on issues that surround surveys. As per the results, it is clear to see that companies have a strict rule on the expression of their views, assessment or reservations on various issues in the parking environment of the same. From the above statistics, it also indicates that the care given by the corporate policy is determined by the reputation obtained from the assessments given. In addition, the conservative approach is deliberated by the slightly measure in the responses.

Table 3

Benefits Received	Number of Responses	Percentage of Total
Very definite	2	1
Moderate	32	19
Slight	94	56
Not at all	41	24
TOTAL	169	100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3 shows the measure of benefits received from responses given to surveys. When the participants take part in the filling of the survey questionnaires and offer their expressions on the same, there is a degree of resultant response offered by the company or the survey providers. The statistics show that there are limited benefits to the nature of responses given by any willing participant. In the same dimension, it can be orchestrated that the degree of freedom in the same survey response basis is responsible for the limited benefits like satisfaction and appraisal efforts offered to the organization that they represent.

Table 4

Percentage of Questionnaires Answered	Number of Responses	Percentage of Total
0-19	24	14
20-39	22	13
40-59	40	24
60-79	38	22
80-100	46	27
TOTAL	170	100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The percentages of surveys answered in the study are depicted by table 4 indicating that the fair majority do participate in the process. As opposed to the lower levels, a considerable number of participants have the knowledge to own the survey process by fulfilling the total requirements needed for each survey once it is administered. The statistics also indicate that despite the restrictions objections delivered by the organizations or companies, the employees take the responsibility of completing the surveys. On the other hand, there is no influence on the benefits obtained at any given time.

 

 

Table 5

Sources of Questionnaires	Composite Score
University personnel	271
University Students	198
Trade organizations	149
Professional associations	116
Federal government	101
State government	50
Other businesses	39
Other	25
TOTAL	949

Table 5 is responsible for showing the various sources of all surveys used in the research and possible inferences that they contain. Majority of the questionnaires or data sets used in the study are from university personnel indicating that a higher percentage is responsible for research and understanding platform. In the above regard, there is limited account of regulations or restrictiveness offered by the institutions when the research is conducted. In addition, the sources are spread by various institutions with a particular aim of obtaining a result to influence standards or systems within the society or employment field.

Table 6

Lease Likely to Be Answered	Composite Score
University students	360
Other businesses	328
University personnel	210
Professional associations	127
Trade organizations	115
State government	18
Federal government	0
Other	57
TOTAL	1,215

Table 6 indicates the level of likelihood of the respondents to undertake the surveys and offer their responses. Majority are the university students who show the willingness to participate in the studies as well as their opinions forming part of the effect. The least likely members to participate and show no level of commitment to the same include the federal government representatives especially due to the nature of their responsibilities. The topics raised in the surveys have also to be particular to the objectives being met at the same time.

Summary and Recommendations

Surveys are intended to show the representation of a sample population’s opinions, reflections or stance towards an issue placed under investigation. In the research developed by the survey basis of corporations, it showed that the restrictiveness, non- benefit systems and authenticity in responses given by majority university students is responsible for the reluctance trends. Improvements can be made on the same to increase the relevance of the survey to organizations as it can help improve their standing with employees while addressing pertinent issues. Additionally, the time taken for each questionnaire and survey administration can be reduced to encourage full participation by all interested parties. A sense of benefits system can also be developed for the time and effort taken by each respondent in the process while restricting by corporations can be decreased through relevance of issues being researched to productivity.