SAR3

Name:

Tutor:

Course:

Date:

SAR3

The two interviews were important towards illustrating my individual levels of creativity, innovation, and solution development in the workplace. From the scores provided I have a relatively adequate ability to analyze problems with an aim of fostering and creating solutions for various tasks set out in my position in the organization. The scores were: analytical problem solving 26, creative problem solving 51, and fostering creativity in the workplace 34, to provide a total score of 111, with the average score being 108 (107.5). The median score for the study was provided as 98-117.

Working in a financial institution is marked by numerous challenges such as diverse customer needs and preferences. In addition, the scores illustrate that I am able to thrive in an environment that is highly demanding in terms of new solutions for existing or emerging problems within the organization. Additionally, the scores illustrate that I have a high ability for creative problem solving at a score of 51. This is based on the need to provide immediate solutions to problems that a client or I encounter in the line of being provided service within the institution.

However, I scored poorly in analytical problem solving given that this usually demands additional effort in terms of engagement with other individuals in teams. Furthermore, failure to develop adequate solutions for analytical tasks poses a challenge. This is because I shy away from tasks that are highly involving and those that demand diligence. In the second interview, I had a poor score of 40 that was below the average score of 56. This affirms that I need to engage in active development of solutions for problems that I may encounter in the organization.