Meeting the Standards of Total Quality Management

Meeting the Standards of Total Quality Management

Name:

Institution:

Meeting the Standards of Total Quality Management

Executive Summary

One of the issues that organizations face involves quality management. With the introduction of quality approaches in America by quality gurus such as W. Howard Deming, corporations have learnt of the positive implications that quality management imposes. Irrespective of the adoption of such mechanisms by organizations, total quality management is ineffective without complying with high standards. The article, Total Quality Management is Not Total, by Walter J. McGee provides a significant insight of the significance of meeting standards within total quality management. In addition to this, the article also offers the reasons concerning the significance of sustaining high-level standards. This is because such standards possess an implication on the application of quality management in respective organizational processes. Furthermore, the respective article also confronts modern quality assurance in relation to management for the respective industry.

In overview, the article expounds on the importance of integrating quality within designs. According to McGee (), integrating design into the system of quality assurance offers an enhanced basis for ensuring standardization in contemporary manufacturing processes. Based on this assertion, it is apparent that the design function plays an important role in ensuring that processes meet the required standards. In addition to the focus on design, the article also illustrates the issues encountered by traditional quality approaches in relation to the provisions offered by quality pundits such as W. Howard Deming. Even though the gurus stressed on the significance of design in engineering requirements, they did not pay much attention to the matter of design quality as a significant aspect of meeting quality standards. Based on the neglect of design quality, it is unavoidable to discover the insufficiency of the mechanisms used to manage the shape of manufactured parts.

Critique

Undeniably, it is safe to agree that design quality assumes an imperative role in assuring that manufacturing meets the standards of total quality management. Irrespective of this, most of the processes utilized by the American industrial sector together with the military as well as the general government seemed not to observe this particular facet. Based on the report provided with respect to the Meteorology Crisis and the Government Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) alert, it was clear that the current quality standards were ineffective considerably. Based on this, it was important to conduct an evaluation of the existing standards, specifically the ASME measurement guidelines, in order to discover the loopholes that may impose massive negative consequences on the quality of manufacturing in the American industry.

Assessment of the American Security Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standards involved scrutinizing the guidelines utilizing geometric principles. By inculcating such principles, the Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Professional (GDTP) underwent implementation in order to concentrate overly on the aspect of design quality. Nonetheless, even though the GDTP offers advantages such as the definition of the measurement orientation as well as the lines connected to the measurement, much of its significance lies in its ability to define the outline of the manufacturing parts. Accordingly, the GDTP addresses every means important for the engineer to manage the fit, operation as well as the cost-effectiveness of the respective designed hardware. Based on this, it is possible to devise a part even in the worst-case scenario. Irrespective of the effectiveness of the GDTP in relation to its ability to shape delineation, it is impossible to assert that the part’s geometric form, even if created to the engineer’s documentation, cannot experience malfunction.

This is because it is still possible to inculcate design errors due to the increased focus on one particular standard. Accordingly, the proposed GDTP has its best strengths in the dimensioning of manufacturing parts using geometric science. Because of this predicament, it makes it possible for engineers as well as the respective management to focus on other current yet efficient approaches that may be assertive as well as assistive in guaranteeing quality functionality of manufacturing parts. For instance, the adoption of GDTP has led to considerable yet automated negligence of former quality approaches such as the Six Sigma method. Even though McGee argues that such approaches negate the significance of design quality, he does not offer a solution towards modifying such strategies into ensuring that the parts as well as their respective users utilize them appropriately.

Moreover, the industrial sector cannot necessarily ignore the human aspect of manufacturing. Accordingly, the adoption of automated manufacturing parts has led to the redundancy of numerous American employees. However, existing quality approaches allowed employees to ensure quality operations thereby securing their occupations within their respective organizations. However, with the introduction of certification programs similar to the GDTP such as the Y14.5 program, Americans began expressing discontent with the respective industry based on the considerable costs that were arising from the burden as well as expenses of training. In addition, the American industrial sector was to experience further expenses as an outcome of the program’s insistence on the adoption of modifications imperative to manufacturing, quality assurance and design. Even though the GDTP stands to provide further advantages in ensuring design quality, it is impossible to assert that it does not possess considerable if not equal demerits to the American industrial sector.

Reference

McGee, J. W. (2004). Total quality management is not total. In F. H. Maidment (Ed.), Annual editions: Management (pp. 123-125). Guilford, CN: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.