Free Speech

Name:

Tutor:

Course:

Date:

Free Speech

The arrangement of the article How Free should Speech be is well organized, and it provides great insight into the need for allowing concurring and contrary opinions within the society. It is noteworthy that such rights should not be abused through erroneous behavior that seeks to destabilize the social order. For example, the highlighting of hate speech, commercial speech, and obscenities, as areas in which such freedom should be restricted is appropriate as it focuses on vital elements of public interaction with the ability to influence events. Restrictions on advertising preferences for corporations are of particular importance for maintaining equality in commerce while obscenities erode morality and hate speech fuels conflict. Therefore, the text is objective as it explores both sides of the debate.

Consequentialism or deontology: The unending political battle provides alternating views on the viability of having free speech while still respecting the First Amendment. It is helpful in detailing the consequences of permitting democracy in all spheres of life while offering integral pointers as to the need for an open society. It is filled with examples of good use of free speech, as well as the outcomes of unregulated interactions, especially within companies. The identification of corporations as avenues for catalyzing the influence of lobbyists in politics is notable as it enhances the role of campaign finance reform within the United States. It is heavily skewed on the negative aspects of such free rein although it also focuses on the views of deontologists who do not consider financial assistance to politicians as corruption. The navigation of this sensitive topic throughout the paper is admirable since it illustrates the limits and opportunities that the country possesses from the implementation of free speech regulations.