Business of Disaster

Name:

Tutor:

Course:

Date:

Business of Disaster

As a feature of joint examination about calamity recuperation, FRONTLINE and NPR attempted to decide how much benefit the private insurance agencies are running the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) were making. FEMA pays expenses to roughly 80 organizations to offer and administration surge arrangements, however, claims are paid utilizing premiums that the organizations gather. Based on the analysis conducted, far-reaching benefits were about $400 million, an impression of how devastating disasters meant greater business for surge insurance agencies. That is because when there are more claims, safety net providers create more in expenses and wind up profiting. To elaborate on the controversial nature upon the discovery of this business generating disaster, The Insurance Information Institute, which is subsidized by the organizations, debated the findings outlined, stating that they were overboard with industry benefits. This clearly indicates the deterioration of integrity in disaster management on their part as disasters serve the primary importance of capital generation.

Despite there being a lack of any provided information, it said that benefits are more like 10 to 15 percent of FEMA installments, after expenses, in light of exchanges with organizations in the flood program. This statement clearly elaborates on the manner in which such organizations have exploited disasters which have left many lives and properties destroyed with vagueness about catering to the claims made by the affected individuals. The gathering likewise said that few large insurance agencies had left the surge protection to advertising currently based on the disinterest elaborated by the carriers as they fail to agree with the underlying economics outlined in the flood program management. This withdrawal by the carriers is indicative of the agencies failing to be accountable for the windfall profits that have been generated from the program that should be used in the creation of a compensation model that is capable of demanding more authority in the disaster management process. Therefore, this investigation serves as a revelation in demonstrating the effectiveness of such agencies regarding handling projects about disaster management in order to save lives and renovated damaged properties. Lastly, based on the findings, it is imperative for further examination to conducted in the manner through which insurance companies are compensated or receive their remuneration to establish the direct correlation between donated funds and money disbarment to the involved agencies in the business.